Right now, karaka trees are fruiting heavily. But not all of them. Some trees are covered in fruit and others have none or very few. Some years ago, I wondered if this meant they had separate sexes, and was able to show that this is the explanation (Garnock-Jones et al. 2007). Male trees do produce a few fruits, so the sexual system in karaka is best described as gynodioecy (some plants strictly female; others are inconstant males).
Here are the two trees that started this research off, photographed this month in Kelburn.
![]()  | 
| Karaka trees in fruit, Kelburn, Wellington, 2014 | 
Here are the same two trees about 10 years ago.
![]()  | 
| Karaka trees in fruit, Kelburn, Wellington, 1998 (from Garnock-Jones et al., 2007) | 
On the female tree, the panicles fruit heavily, with many of the flowers (but by no means all) developing fruits.
![]()  | 
| Fruits on a female karaka tree | 
On males, usually a single fruit develops on each of a few panicles.
![]()  | 
| Fruits on a male karaka tree | 
![]()  | 
| Karaka flowers. On a female tree (left); male tree (right) | 
Reference.
Garnock-Jones PJ, Brockie RE, FitzJohn RG 2007. Gynodioecy, sexual dimorphism and erratic fruiting in Corynocarpus laevigatus (Corynocarpaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 55: 803–808.





Finally an explaination for my sparse fruiting! I have added a reference in Wikipedia. Thanks for the research.
ReplyDeleteexcept I was too enthusiastic with the edit which has infringed the copyright rules so has been disallowed.
DeletePhil here: if it was rejected for using one of my photos, I can make them CC-BY-4.0 and put them on Wikimedia commons, so long as they're not ones that were in my published paper (and I have better ones of the flowers now).
Delete